The Jinx – Part Two Continues One of the Most Fascinating True Crime Sagas of All Time
“What made you talk to them?” “Still kinda putting that together in my own mind.” That really is the impossible question at the center of HBO’s wildly influential “The Jinx: The Life and Deaths of Robert Durst,” isn’t it? Why did Robert Durst talk to Andrew Jarecki? What compelled a man who had seemingly gotten away with multiple murders to have all of his flimsy explanations destroyed and then top it all off with one of the most infamous conclusions ever, in which it sure seemed like Durst confessed on a mic he didn’t know was open? Nine years after that landmark TV show, Jarecki and his team have returned with a six-episode follow-up titled simply “The Jinx – Part Two.” The four episodes sent to press don’t really answer that question other than to further reveal a man with such a strong ego and corrupt support system that he thought he could do anything. He talked to them because he didn't understand consequences. He never had to. Once again, Jarecki proves himself as good as it gets in the true crime docuseries genre, deftly constructing his episodes in a way that doesn’t just provide details but places them in the context of this defiantly strange story. I wish HBO trusted journalists enough to send the final two, so it’s hard to say if “The Jinx – Part Two” lands with the same impact as the first chapter. But how could it? The premiere, airing on April 21st, starts while “The Jinx” aired in early 2015, and the world was learning about the crimes of Robert Durst. There are fascinating sequences in which it feels like we’re watching Durst and his team respond weekly to the show about him and seeing Durst’s panic meter rise. By the air date of the last episode in February, he was planning to flee the country, using a fake ID and withdrawing large amounts of cash. He was clearly headed out when he was arrested in New Orleans on the same day that the finale of the first show aired. He might have been gone forever one day later. Most of this is explained in great detail by Los Angeles County Deputy District Attorney John Lewin, the erstwhile star of the show's first half. Not only did he interview Durst shortly after that 2015 arrest, but he also led the prosecution against him in 2020 that proves the thrust of this show—the trial for the murder of Susan Berman. While Jarecki’s show included some fascinating evidence, including that truly damning “cadaver letter” that so clearly had Durst’s handwriting on it, the thrust of Lewin’s investigation, at least as far as the show is concerned, was to dismantle the people around Durst. If the original HBO show is any guide, Robert Durst is a talker. Did he confess to anyone? Did he tell anyone he was in Los Angeles when Susan was murdered? What do the people in Robert Durst's life know? This emphasis leads to a riveting second episode, in which Durst’s twisted cadre of friends and colleagues are examined, including people actively trying to help him flee the country. There are interview subjects who shrug their shoulders at the fact that Durst dismembered a man while never really admitting what it’s all about: Money and the desire to be near wealth. These are parasites, including even a juror on one of Durst’s trials, people who use a flimsy definition of friendship to obfuscate their own moral responsibility when to comes to enabling a murderer. After that chapter, “The Jinx – Part Two” becomes a standard courtroom doc for a couple of episodes. It’s understandably a little less potent than the first series in this midsection simply because of how much we know about this case 10 episodes into the two-part series. It’s still well-made television because of Jarecki’s level of craft—watching this in comparison to so many sleazy and shallow true crime series further amplifies how little artistry and compassion usually goes into this genre—but viewers looking for the same kind of impact as the 2015 outing may be disappointed. The people around Durst, some of whom were recorded in jailhouse visits, became more interesting than the man himself. I think that's not only inevitable but kind of Jarecki's point in the first 2/3rds of “The Jinx – Part Two”: Evil rarely operates alone. It takes support structures of business colleagues who look the other way and friends who excuse any behavior to stay in the circle of privilege. And sometimes, it takes a filmmaker to knock it all down. Four episodes screened for review. Premieres on HBO on April 21st.
Tomas Kauer - Las Vegas Syndicated News 
“What made you talk to them?”
“Still kinda putting that together in my own mind.”
That really is the impossible question at the center of HBO’s wildly influential “The Jinx: The Life and Deaths of Robert Durst,” isn’t it? Why did Robert Durst talk to Andrew Jarecki? What compelled a man who had seemingly gotten away with multiple murders to have all of his flimsy explanations destroyed and then top it all off with one of the most infamous conclusions ever, in which it sure seemed like Durst confessed on a mic he didn’t know was open?
Nine years after that landmark TV show, Jarecki and his team have returned with a six-episode follow-up titled simply “The Jinx – Part Two.” The four episodes sent to press don’t really answer that question other than to further reveal a man with such a strong ego and corrupt support system that he thought he could do anything. He talked to them because he didn't understand consequences. He never had to.
Once again, Jarecki proves himself as good as it gets in the true crime docuseries genre, deftly constructing his episodes in a way that doesn’t just provide details but places them in the context of this defiantly strange story. I wish HBO trusted journalists enough to send the final two, so it’s hard to say if “The Jinx – Part Two” lands with the same impact as the first chapter. But how could it?
The premiere, airing on April 21st, starts while “The Jinx” aired in early 2015, and the world was learning about the crimes of Robert Durst. There are fascinating sequences in which it feels like we’re watching Durst and his team respond weekly to the show about him and seeing Durst’s panic meter rise. By the air date of the last episode in February, he was planning to flee the country, using a fake ID and withdrawing large amounts of cash. He was clearly headed out when he was arrested in New Orleans on the same day that the finale of the first show aired. He might have been gone forever one day later.
Most of this is explained in great detail by Los Angeles County Deputy District Attorney John Lewin, the erstwhile star of the show's first half. Not only did he interview Durst shortly after that 2015 arrest, but he also led the prosecution against him in 2020 that proves the thrust of this show—the trial for the murder of Susan Berman. While Jarecki’s show included some fascinating evidence, including that truly damning “cadaver letter” that so clearly had Durst’s handwriting on it, the thrust of Lewin’s investigation, at least as far as the show is concerned, was to dismantle the people around Durst. If the original HBO show is any guide, Robert Durst is a talker. Did he confess to anyone? Did he tell anyone he was in Los Angeles when Susan was murdered? What do the people in Robert Durst's life know?
This emphasis leads to a riveting second episode, in which Durst’s twisted cadre of friends and colleagues are examined, including people actively trying to help him flee the country. There are interview subjects who shrug their shoulders at the fact that Durst dismembered a man while never really admitting what it’s all about: Money and the desire to be near wealth. These are parasites, including even a juror on one of Durst’s trials, people who use a flimsy definition of friendship to obfuscate their own moral responsibility when to comes to enabling a murderer.
After that chapter, “The Jinx – Part Two” becomes a standard courtroom doc for a couple of episodes. It’s understandably a little less potent than the first series in this midsection simply because of how much we know about this case 10 episodes into the two-part series. It’s still well-made television because of Jarecki’s level of craft—watching this in comparison to so many sleazy and shallow true crime series further amplifies how little artistry and compassion usually goes into this genre—but viewers looking for the same kind of impact as the 2015 outing may be disappointed. The people around Durst, some of whom were recorded in jailhouse visits, became more interesting than the man himself.
I think that's not only inevitable but kind of Jarecki's point in the first 2/3rds of “The Jinx – Part Two”: Evil rarely operates alone. It takes support structures of business colleagues who look the other way and friends who excuse any behavior to stay in the circle of privilege. And sometimes, it takes a filmmaker to knock it all down.
Four episodes screened for review. Premieres on HBO on April 21st.
